Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

2 Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

Abstract

Background: An effective and reliable assessment tool is essential for evaluating the leisure activities of patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Iranian-developed version of leisure questionnaire for people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods: Psychometric methods were used to assess face, content, differential, and convergent validity, as well as test-retest reliability. The study used SPSS software to enter data and assessed content validity using descriptive characteristics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on ratings by experts. Independent t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyse the differential validity, while the Pearson test was used to analyse the convergent validity by comparing it with the Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ). The study calculated the reliability of the questionnaire using the paired t-test and ICC.
Results: The subjects were 60 patients with MS. The content validity analysis showed a single measure validity coefficient of 0.158 and an average measure coefficient of 0.751, both of which were statistically significant. The results of the differential validity analysis for the entire questionnaire were also significant (t = -3.058, P = 0.003). Additionally, the convergent validity and reliability of the questionnaire were 0.92 and 0.82, respectively.
Conclusion: The 50-item leisure questionnaire designed for patients with MS demonstrated good validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be used as an effective research tool for exploring the leisure activities of individuals with MS.

Keywords

  1. Hall HJ. O. T. a New Profession. Concord, NH: Rumford Press; 1923.
  2. American Occupational Therapy Association. Uniform terminology system for reporting occupational therapy services. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc; 1979.
  3. Mosey AC. Psychosocial components of occupational therapy. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1986.
  4. Primeau LA. Work and leisure: transcending the dichotomy. Am J Occup Ther 1996; 50(7): 569-77.
  5. Radomski MV, Latham CAT. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  6. Jacob G, Mounir G. Measuring leisure satisfaction. J Leis Res 1980; 12(1): 20-33.
  7. Hinojosa J, Kramer P. Integrating children with disabilities into family play. In: Parham LD, Fazio LS, Editors. Play in occupational therapy for children. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1997. p. 159-70.
  8. Hosseini SMS, Nurani Gharaborghe S, Asgari A. Leisure questionnaire of people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences and Research 2023; 10(2): 70-4.
  9. Passmore A, French D. Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents' participation in leisure activities. Adolescence 2001; 36(141): 67-75.
  10. Jopp DS, Hertzog C. Assessing adult leisure activities: an extension of a self-report activity questionnaire. Psychol Assess 2010; 22(1): 108-20.
  11. Baum CM, Edwards D. ACS: Activity Card Sort. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; 2008.
  12. Cheung M, Ot B, Ting W, Ot M, Ly C, Mmedsc C, et al. Leisure participation and health- related quality of life of community- dwelling elders in Hong Kong. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 4(1): 15-23.
  13. Drummond AE, Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Logan PA. Development and validation of the Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ). Clin Rehabil 2001; 15(6): 647-56.
  14. Vanner EA, Block P, Christodoulou CC, Horowitz BP, Krupp LB. Pilot study exploring quality of life and barriers to leisure-time physical activity in persons with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis. Disabil Health J 2008; 1(1): 58-65.
  15. Khemthong S, Packer T, Passmore A, Dhaliwal S. Development of a Classification of Leisure Participation (CLP) scale: Perceptions of leisure activities of women with and without chronic conditions. Perth, Australia: Curtin University; 2005.
  16. Wikstrom I, Arvidsson B, Nilsson K, Roos E, Jacobsson LT. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a new leisure index: The Patient-Specific Leisure Scale (PSLS). Musculoskeletal Care 2009; 7(3): 178-93.
  17. Tondnevis F. The physical acitivities in leisure time of the Iranian women. Harakat 2002; (12): 87-105. [In Persian].
  18. Hosseini SMS. Factor structure and explaining a model for the leisure based on the Model of Human Occupation in the multiple sclerosis patients [PhD Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2016. [In Persian].
  19. Hosseini SM, Asgari A, Rassafiani M, Yazdani F, Mazdeh M. Leisure time activities of Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study. Health Promot Perspect 2016; 6(1): 47-53.
  20. Hosseini SMS, Sarhady M, Nurani Gharaborghe S, Mazdeh M. Leisure of people with multiple sclerosis: A content analysis. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2017; 15(1): 23-30.
  21. Fattahi MR, Noormohammadpour P, Ramezani M, Sahraian MA, Mansournia MA, Tabesh MR, et al. Translation and validation of the Persian version of Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2021; 21(1): 431.
  22. Thorndike RL. Applid psychometrics. Trans. Hooman HA. 3rd Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press; 1996.
  23. Nicholl CR, Lincoln NB, Playford ED. The reliability and validity of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2002; 8(5): 372-6.
  24. Alves-Stein S, George S, Jolliffe L, Lannin NA. Implementation of a leisure reintegration programme for people with acquired brain injury in a community rehabilitation programme: A feasibility study. Brain Impair 2023; 24(3): 508-20.